|
- logic - What is the difference between Fact and Truth? - Philosophy . . .
Truth is what the singer gives to the listener when she’s brave enough to open up and sing from her heart But still curious about the difference between both of them In our daily life, in general conversation, we generally use these both terms interchangeably Then what is the difference? Are they synonym or have specific difference?
- How Exactly Do You Define Truth? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
In summary truth emerges only after more thorough philosophy is gained, from East to West everyone has their own intuitive idiosyncratic notion of truth, thus its nature is highly dependent on ones' entire metaphysical or epistemic system
- truth - What is opinion? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
It is commonly agreed that there is a clear distinction between fact and opinion Physical facts can be verified Opinion varies and may be based on faith But what about opinions which, over time,
- Can truth exist without language? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
4 "Whether truth can exist without language" and "that truth is an objective reality that exists independently of us" are not opposed claims, although they don't imply one another A Platonist would tell you that language, like other mental objects, exists in the ideal realm whether people are around to think about it or not
- logic - The absolute truth paradox - Philosophy Stack Exchange
"There is no absolute truth because we as humans are restrained from ever knowing it" is fallacious, what humans can know imposes no restriction on what is And "this" will only be a way out of the paradox after it specifies which axioms of classical logic are supposed to be dropped, and shows that what is left is enough and otherwise reasonable There are several options described in standard
- What is the basis for Kants misquote If the truth shall kill them . . .
I recently discovered that the quote "If the truth shall kill them, let them die" is falsely attributed to Kant, and actually stems from Ayn Rand paraphrasing Kant [1] [2] Which work passage could
- logic - Is it true in some sense that the only truth people are . . .
Therefore it seems reasonable to me to claim that the only "truth" people are capable of knowing is the "truth" that they assume to be true in their reasoning Also all the deduced "truths" from such true assumptions would be counted as such truths
- truth - Is to be able to describe something to be able to judge that it . . .
A sentence is truth apt if there is some context in which it could be uttered (with its present meaning) and express a true or false proposition Thus, to argue anymore over whether the sentence is true is merely resolved by accepting that it is true within a domain of discourse, that is, the sentence is truth-apt
|
|
|