|
- word choice - Difference between 대해서 and 대한? - Korean Language Stack . . .
so -에 대한 will always be followed by a noun, whereas -에 대해서 should be followed by a verb phrase (the verb phrase might begin with a noun, but should end with a verb) In the sentence "인터뷰에 대한 소식이 없어요", "인터뷰에 대한" describes 소식 - we can say "news about the interview" If we can say "Noun about
- Is there any difference between ~에 대한 and ~에 관한?
When one wishes to express subjective attitude or opinion about a 대상(對象 - object subject topic), ~에 대한 is used to designate the 대상 in question ~에 관한 is used to express a purely objective view about the 대상 in question The word 대하다 has several usage: To express physical proximity regarding the object
- grammar - What construction is -데 대한? - Korean Language Stack Exchange
The original form should be '데에 대한' One confusing thing about Korean is that in many cases, you have to tell between 의존명사(dependent noun), 조사(postposition) and 접미사(suffix) Even native Koreans usually don't recognize the difference and mix these, but they sure are different
- 사람들에 대한 조사를 했다 vs 사람들에 대해 조사했다
사람들에 대한 조사를 했다 vs 사람들에 대해 조사했다 I agree that both are natural for daily uses However, for formal occassions where conciseness matters, the latter serves better We usually avoid saying ~를 했다 for verbs when there is a shorter counterpart But as you know, in casual conversations, it doesn't really
- word choice - What is the difference between 스스로 and 자기? - Korean . . .
(1) 그는 그것이 스스로에 대한(=자기에 대한, 자기 자신에 대한) 도전이라 믿는다 He believes that it is a challenge to him (2) 우리 문제는 우리 스스로가 푼다 As for our problem, we must solve it by ourselves (By using 스스로, there is an added emphasis Here we cannot replace it with 자기 ) 자기
- What does . . . 지군 하다 mean? When is it used?
자기 일터에 대한 많고많은 자랑을 하나둘 꼽아갈 때마다 종업원들의 이야기는 저도모르게 직장장에 대한 이야기로 이어지군 하였다 Above sentence could be translated as follows: As keep mentioning about proud things of their workplace, workers used to begin to talk about their workplace
- Is there a big difference between 하는 것이 좋다 and 하면 좋다?
그 책을 읽는 것이 좋다 그 책을 읽으면 좋다 What's the difference between the 'feel' of these? I've read that 는 것이 좋다 has more of a feel of an instruction - "you should read this book
- What is a natural way to refer to the contents of a video, or text
뉴스는 어제 일어난 지진에 대한 거였어요 = The news was about the earthquake that occurred yesterday #1 is longer and more cumbersome, so #2 is usually preferred in simple phrasing Similar structure for your example would be 비디오는 지진 상황 중 간호사의 어린이 대피에 대한 거였어요 = The video was
|
|
|